Plan under fire

The New York Times

January 12, 2006
Anger Meets New Orleans Renewal Plan
By GARY RIVLIN

NEW ORLEANS, Jan. 11 - Residents of the city's most devastated neighborhoods responded with anger Wednesday after the city's rebuilding commission unveiled its most contentious proposal: giving neighborhoods in low-lying parts of the city from four months to a year to prove they should not be bulldozed.

The plan was presented at a standing-room-only meeting punctuated by catcalls and angry outbursts that often interrupted members of the panel. "Over my dead body" was uttered more than once.

"I'm going to suit up like I'm going to Iraq and fight this," said Harvey Bender, a laid-off city worker, who shouted out his comments before an audience at the Sheraton Hotel that numbered in the hundreds and spilled into the aisles and hallways.

Mr. Bender owns a home in New Orleans East, a predominantly black middle-class neighborhood of 90,000 residents largely destroyed by the flooding that followed Hurricane Katrina. Parts of the neighborhood might not survive, according to the plan, if they do not attract enough returning residents.

Speaker after speaker, black and white, prosperous and poor, dismissed a plan that Mayor C. Ray Nagin described as "controversial." But Mr. Nagin gave them hope as he walked a middle line that neither endorsed the plan nor opposed it.

"This is only a recommendation," Mr. Nagin said in remarks that preceded the formal presentation of the rebuilding plan. "We as a community will have the ultimate say in how we move forward."

The mayor called on people to listen to the commission's presentation with an open mind. "Take the time to digest this information, to look it over very carefully," Mr. Nagin said. "The reality is we will have limited resources to redevelop our city."

Yet the audience did not seem in the mood for calm debate.

"Please let us build our own homes," said Charles Young, a homeowner in Lakeview, a largely white middle-class neighborhood. "Let us come back on our own time. Let us spend our insurance money, which we paid for on our own."

Under the proposal, residents would not be permitted to move back into the hardest-hit neighborhoods - about two-thirds of the city, including more than half its homeowners - for at least four months. During that time, leaders of each neighborhood would have to submit to a citywide planning body a recovery plan that would have to be approved before residents would be allowed back.

Neighborhoods not able to come up with an acceptable plan, or those that do not attract sufficient development within a year, could be bulldozed and returned to marshland, with the city compensating homeowners.

The plan represents a compromise between the homeowners in low-lying areas who are determined to rebuild, and the scientists and other experts who believe the city should allow large portions of its flood-prone areas to revert to marshland.

Each neighborhood would have at its disposal teams of planners and other experts to help residents do what they need to prevent the city from forcing them to live elsewhere.

"We want to give every community as best a chance to come back as we can," said Joseph C. Canizaro, a member of the commission. Much of the crowd's enmity was directed at Mr. Canizaro, the plan's main author and a prominent developer here, who was booed several times.

"Joe Canizaro, I don't know you, but I hate you," said Mr. Bender, the New Orleans East resident, when granted his turn at the microphone.

Robyn Braggs, another resident of New Orleans East, said, "I don't think four or five months is close to enough time given all we would need to do." Because former residents are scattered around the country, she said, many, especially those with school-age children, "won't be able to even return to do the work necessary until this summer."

Marc H. Morial, a former mayor of New Orleans who is now president of the National Urban League, described the commission's proposal as a "massive red-lining plan wrapped around a giant land grab." Many homeowners will not be able to settle with their insurance companies if they do not know the future of their neighborhoods, he said.

"It's cruel to bar people from rebuilding," Mr. Morial said. "Telling people they can't rebuild for four months is tantamount to saying they can't ever come back. It's telling people who have lost almost everything that we're going to take the last vestige of what they own."

Not everyone opposed the plan. One resident of Eastover, a wealthy, largely black community in the eastern part of the city devastated by the storm, told the commissioners, "I accept your challenge" to craft a workable rebuilding plan. He added, "I probably will get hit up the side of the head for my comments."

The plan also impressed Sean Reilly, a member of the Louisiana Recovery Authority, who criticized the city last week, saying it had given the impression that all neighborhoods could be restored. Wednesday, he said the plan struck the proper balance between residents' self-determination and tough choices.

The plan was developed by the rebuilding commission's Urban Planning committee, which Mr. Canizaro led. It is the first of seven committee reports to be unveiled over the next week and one component of a sweeping redevelopment plan that includes proposals for a $3 billion light-rail system and an economic development corporation, fashioned after the one New York created to oversee rebuilding in Lower Manhattan after the Sept. 11 attacks.

The commission is also proposing that New Orleans borrow a second idea from New York: asking the federal government for permission to sell tax-exempt bonds to rebuild businesses, just as New York was able to do to rebuild downtown.

But the commission will clearly have a difficult time selling its plan to residents. "This is a big, audacious plan put together by obviously brilliant people," said Fred Yoder, a resident of Lakeview. "But you missed the boat. We don't need a rail system. We need housing."###



Some residents angry over New Orleans plan
Four-month moratorium on new building permits comes under fire

The Associated Press
Updated: 10:37 p.m. ET Jan. 11, 2006


NEW ORLEANS - Angry residents expressed frustration Wednesday at the debut of rebuilding proposals for this devastated city, taking aim at a suggested four-month moratorium on new building permits in areas heavily flooded by Hurricane Katrina.

“Our neighborhood is ready to come home,” said property owner Jeb Bruneau of Lakeview, which borders Lake Pontchartrain. “Don’t get in our way and prevent us from doing that. Help us cut the red tape.”

The Bring New Orleans Back Commission, appointed by Mayor Ray Nagin, released its initial recommendations to a packed crowd of local residents. The plans could become part of a blueprint for rebuilding New Orleans — a task unparalleled in American history.

The idea behind the moratorium is to ensure that enough people would move back to a neighborhood to avoid large expanses with isolated houses.

But that didn’t sit well with residents from the hard-hit Ninth Ward, Lakeview and east New Orleans. Several lashed out at commission members, such as prominent New Orleans developer Joseph Canizaro.

‘Scheming to take our land’
“I don’t know you, but Mr. Canizaro, I hate you,” Harvey Bender of the Lower Ninth Ward said as he pointed his finger. “You’ve been in the background scheming to take our land.”

After the meeting, Canizaro met with Bender and promised to explain the commission’s recommendations in greater detail.

“I told him I want to do everything I can to help this city. I’m not going to make a dime off this,” Canizaro said. Commission members have pledged not to profit from their positions on the panel.

Another resident, Carolyn Parker, said: “I don’t think it’s right that you take our properties. Over my dead body.”

Others vowing to fight the plan include City Council members, the New Orleans chapter of the NAACP and former mayor and National Urban League president Marc Morial.

The NAACP said it would be unfair not to allow residents to rebuild and questioned suggestions that some areas of the city should not be rebuilt because they are not “sustainable.”

The commission will unveil more rebuilding plans in the coming days, and it hopes to form a clearer picture of what areas would be rebuilt by the end of the year. Besides home and neighborhood reconstruction, the proposals will cover schools, transportation, entertainment and other topics.

But the most contentious issues have to do with how flooded neighborhoods should be rebuilt.

Despite residents’ complaints, the rebuilding recommendations have actually been characterized as too liberal and unrealistic by many urban planners. The Urban Land Institute and other planners have said it would be unsafe and unwise to rebuild those sections of the city where the flooding reached rooftops and which could be flooded again by another hurricane.

Nagin is expected to have all proposals in hand on Jan. 20. He then can approve or reject the recommendations. The plan is expected, though, to be presented to President Bush, who asked early on that Orleanians come up with a vision for rebuilding the city.

The commission offered a phased-in approach for rebuilding. It said each of the city’s 13 neighborhood development districts should come up with a rebuilding plan by May 20, and that a citywide picture should be formed by June 20.

‘This is a journey’
The neighborhood groups would need to figure out if and how their sections of the city could be built. The commission envisions setting up a federally funded land bank that would have the power to buy homes and land that residents choose to abandon.

Nagin sought to assuage residents’ fears that the recommendations are the final word on rebuilding.

“This is a process,” he said. “This is a journey.”

Meanwhile, a commission established by Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour unveiled a blueprint to rebuild that state’s coastal areas.

The report recommended safe, affordable housing that can be easily financed. There is an immediate need for 10,000 homes, and 50,000 more over five years, the report said.

The report by the panel led by former Netscape CEO Jim Barksdale also suggested free public transportation for two years to help those who lost vehicles during the storm.

The recommendations are not binding, but are intended as tools for communities to use in tackling housing, transportation, sewage, education, finances and other issues.

© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

© 2006 MSNBC.com